Save as PDF

Agency Report
Department of the Army

Mission: To defend the nation and its interests by providing expeditionary land forces wherever and whenever they are required. The Army's primary aim is to achieve this defense through deterrence-posing the realistic threat of lethal action should it become necessary. The Army's strategic function is to provide trained and ready forces to support the combatant commanders.

http://www.army.mil/

Subcomponents

Field Operating Agencies of the Army Staff Resourced Through OA-22 (Army) - Score: 55.6
Field Operating Offices of Office of the Secretary of the Army (Army) - Score: 72.6
Immediate Office of the Chief-of-Staff of the Army (Army) - Score: 61.1
Joint Activities (Army) - Score: 59.4
Joint Services and Activities Supported By the Office, Secretary of the Army (Army) - Score: 50.4
Office of the Chief of the National Guard Bureau (Army) - Score: 62.4
Office of the Secretary of the Army (Army) - Score: 55.3
U.S. Army Accessions Command (Army) - Score: 62.7
U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center (Army) - Score: 63.7
U.S. Army Audit Agency (Army) - Score: 85.7
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army) - Score: 65.6
U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (Army) - Score: 59.2
U.S. Army Forces Command (Army) - Score: 66.9
U.S. Army Installation Management Agency (Army) - Score: 55.9
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (Army) - Score: 54.0
U.S. Army Materiel Command (Army) - Score: 61.4
U.S. Army Medical Command (Army) - Score: 59.6
U.S. Army Military District of Washington (Army) - Score: 54.6
U.S. Army National Guard Units (Army) - Score: 67.6
U.S. Army Netcom/9th Army Signal Command (Army) - Score: 53.7
U.S. Army Reserve Command (Army) - Score: 55.0
U.S. Army South Command (Army) - Score: 67.3
U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command/U.S. Army Forces Strategic Command (Army) - Score: 53.9
U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command (Army) - Score: 51.1
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (Army) - Score: 63.3
U.S. Army War College (Army) - Score: 64.6
U.S. Army, Europe (DOT) - Score: 60.9
U.S. Army, Pacific (Army) - Score: 59.7
U.S. Military Academy (Army) - Score: 58.4
U.S. Military Entrance Processing Command (Army) - Score: 55.2
U.S. Special Operations Command (Army) - Score: 68.3

Scores and Rankings

• 2012
• Previous Years

	Score	Rank of 19
Index Score	60.9	14
Scores by Category	Score	Rank (out of varied totals)
Effective Leadership	54.2	10 of 19
Effective Leadership - Empowerment	49.1	8 of 19
Effective Leadership - Fairness	54.1	10 of 19
Effective Leadership - Senior Leaders	48.8	11 of 19
Effective Leadership - Supervisors	62.3	14 of 19
Employee Skills/Mission Match	78.8	6 of 19
Pay	55.0	17 of 19
Strategic Management	55.5	12 of 19
Teamwork	64.6	11 of 19
Training and Development	60.8	9 of 19
Work/Life Balance	61.8	9 of 19
Support for Diversity	55.5	13 of 19
Performance Based Rewards and Advancement	44.4	12 of 19
Alternative Work and Employee Support Programs	74.6	10 of 18
Index Scores by Demographic	Score	Rank (out of varied totals)
Female	61.8	15 of 18
Male	65.7	11 of 18
40 and over	65.0	11 of 18
Under 40	62.7	12 of 18
American Indian or Native American	58.3	12 of 18
Asian	67.6	13 of 18
Black or African-American	65.3	12 of 18
Hispanic or Latino	64.3	12 of 18
Multi-racial	57.1	13 of 18
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	64.0	11 of 16
White	64.6	13 of 18
Employees with Disabilities	60.1	7 of 18
Veterans	64.1	11 of 18
Senior Executive Service (SES)	84.4	7 of 18

	2011	2010	2009	2007	2005	2003
Index Score	64.9	65.6	64.5	64.8	64.9	61.2
Scores by Category	2011	2010	2009	2007	2005	2003
Effective Leadership	57.3	57.4	56.2	55.9	55.2	48.7
Effective Leadership - Empowerment	53.1	53.8	52.9	53.3	53.5	47.0
Effective Leadership - Fairness	55.8	56.4	51.7	49.5	49.6	44.4
Effective Leadership - Senior Leaders	52.4	52.3	52.1	51.1	49.9	43.2
Effective Leadership - Supervisors	65.0	65.0	64.3	65.1	64.1	57.2
Employee Skills/Mission Match	79.6	80.0	80.2	80.0	79.4	79.7
Pay	58.6	61.8	58.8	61.9
Strategic Management	58.3	58.8	58.7	59.0	58.9	58.4
Teamwork	65.7	66.7	72.1	72.1	72.1	66.9
Training and Development	62.2	62.9	63.3	62.5	62.7	57.4
Work/Life Balance	62.4	63.3	64.9	63.8	65.2	65.0
Support for Diversity	58.5	58.3	62.5	61.1	60.0	57.6
Performance Based Rewards and Advancement	47.7	48.5	47.6	48.4	46.9	43.5
Alternative Work and Employee Support Programs	76.5
Index Scores by Demographic	2011	2010	2009	2007	2005	2003
Female	65.6	64.1	62.1
Male	68.0	69.8	65.8
40 and over	67.7	67.5	64.7
Under 40	65.9	68.1	63.9
American Indian or Native American	67.8	64.1	59.9
Asian	72.2	70.8	65.7
Black or African-American	68.3	66.4	66.5
Hispanic or Latino	63.8	63.7	69.3
Multi-racial	60.6	54.8	58.4
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
White	67.4	69.4	64.7
Employees with Disabilities
Veterans
Senior Executive Service (SES)

Workforce Size and Trends

Number of Employees in 2001:  206,565

Number of Employees in 2002:  207,374

Number of Employees in 2003:  203,390

Number of Employees in 2004:  206,648

Number of Employees in 2005:  213,642

Number of Employees in 2006:  216,506

Number of Employees in 2007:  217,186

Number of Employees in 2008:  226,939

Number of Employees in 2009:  242,402

Number of Employees in 2010:  258,999

Number of Employees in 2011:  255,487

Employees joined (2011):  21,460

Percentage joined (2011):  8.40%

Average joined (2005-2011):  24,238

Employees left (2011):  29,285

Percentage left (2011):  11.50%

Average left (2005-2011):  20,551

Rookie ratio (percentage of workforce with less than three years of service):  22.80%

Demographics source: FedScope, U.S. Office of Personnel Management